Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christian's avatar

Jesse, thank you for this informed summary of DBH’s work. I read his interview - what we think we know about God... - with great interest, particularly when it turned to the topic of dogma and tradition.

It seems to me that Eastern Orthodoxy for DBH is a sort of “best that we can do”. Or perhaps his disdain is for the the current dominant iteration of the tradition - neo-patristic? fundamentalist? Again, to speak personally, I am not (yet) Orthodox, and several of my hang ups seem to be in line with DBH’s critique(s).

I imagine that DBH discerns within an EO - with its minimal dogmatic formulations and its embracing of mystery - a generosity that facilitates a more syncretistic approach to the faith. I guess, as an outsider looking in - close to the periphery as a catechumen - I wonder again, how this capaciousness within patristic/orthodox thought squares with a rather rigid and proscribed tradition that sees itself - or so I have heard - in possession of the ‘full truth’.

I sometimes wonder whether one can be theologically EO and yet be working this out in a less formal historical setting.

Anyway, there’s a lot to unpack in my ramblings. I suppose my ultimate question is where does one find a manifestation of Orthodoxy that can handle the justified critiques of DBH?

Thank you for your time

Expand full comment
Treydon Lunot's avatar

Thanks!

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts